In local councils and parliaments across Australia, exclusively Christian prayers are recited to open official proceedings.
In the national parliament, elected representatives are asked to stand for the Lord’s Prayer at the opening of every day in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
At the local government level, the practice varies. Some councils begin with a version of the Lord’s Prayer or other prayers that commit councillors to work for the ‘glory of God’. Others invite local religious ministers into meetings to deliver a sermon and a prayer. At the Redlands City Council in Queensland, some sermons have lasted up to 10 minutes.
Government meetings should be inclusive and welcoming for everyone. Governments should not have favourite religions.
Reciting a Christian prayer at the start of meetings is exclusionary. It means that many elected representatives, staff members, and members of the public who do not belong to the favoured religion are made to feel unwelcome, excluded, and like second-class citizens.
Government institutions are supposed to represent and serve all Australians. They should be promoting inclusiveness and be welcoming of all people. No one should be made to feel like they don’t belong in a government institution in Australia just because of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
Privileging one religion is especially problematic. The Australian community is diverse and made up of people who adhere to a great variety of religious belief systems and people who, increasingly, identify as not religious.
In regard to prayers in local councils, a peer-reviewed legal analysis published in the Alternative Law Journal in 2021 concluded the practice of local councils incorporating prayers into their formal meetings was unlawful.
We know many MPs and Senators in the federal parliament are opposed to the recital of prayers in parliament, choosing to wait outside the chambers while the prayer is recited rather than be forced to participate in a ritual against their values and beliefs.
In 2018, the Australian Senate reported that there was no “momentum for change”. However, there is clearly now momentum for change across the country on this issue.
In 2022, the new President of the Senate and atheist, Sue Lines, said she wanted to see prayers “gone”. She argued “…if we are genuine about the diversity of the parliament we cannot continue to say a Christian prayer to open the day.”
In 2022, Tim Watts told the parliament that, as an atheist, he thought the prayer was inappropriate.
At state level, the Victorian government has promised change, and members of parliament in South Australia and New South Wales have indicated they will raise the issue during 2023.
In August 2021, The Age newspaper’s editorial argued that the Victorian parliament should remove the prayer ritual: “Victoria has changed for the better since 1918 and is a more welcoming and diverse community. It’s important Parliament reflects and supports those changes.”
Even religious figures are saying publicly they don’t think the Lord’s Prayer is appropriate in parliament. In 2022, Reverend Michael Jensen, of the Anglican Church, said: “I am not wedded to the Lord’s Prayer and it doesn’t cook my breakfast either. I mean, I am wedded to the Lord’s Prayer, but not particularly having the Lord’s Prayer said in parliament.”
We’re helping to build momentum for change across the country.
We’ve been busy raising awareness about the issue of prayers in government – at the local, state and federal levels – and directly lobbying councillors and members of parliament.
Councillors are leading the way in demanding change, including a group of 21 councillors who signed a joint letter in Victoria in January 2023.
We’ve been highlighting developments at numerous councils – including at the Fraser Coast Council in Queensland, Glenorchy Council and Clarence Council in Tasmania, Mildura Rural City Council and Gippsland South Council in Victoria, Wagga Wagga and Shoalhaven councils in New South Wales, and Adelaide City Council in South Australia.
In July 2021, RSA president Meredith Doig made a presentation at a meeting of Boroondara City Council in Victoria on the need to replace prayer rituals (watch below).
We are also actively lobbying state and federal parliaments to replace prayer practices with secular and more inclusive practices.
You can help us to make an impact by making a donation to our RSA Fighting Fund. Every dollar will help to build public awareness and ignite a movement at the grassroots level to achieve change. In the future, money from the RSA Fighting Fund may go toward supporting legal challenges.
You can also contact your local councillor or state/territory or federal member of parliament to urge them to replace prayer rituals with something more welcoming and inclusive.
The imposition of religious prayers as part of local government meetings contravenes Victoria’s human rights law, according to legal advice provided to one local council.
The Rationalist Society of Australia has sought a commitment from the four largest parties contesting the Tasmanian election to replace prayer rituals with a more
The Victorian Opposition has vowed to “fiercely oppose” any attempt to remove daily Christian prayer rituals from the state parliament. In a speech to parliament
One-third of the total number of lawmakers in the Victorian Parliament’s upper house are boycotting the Christian prayer ritual at the start of each day.
In a push to encourage the Victorian government to deliver on its promise of removing Christian prayers from parliament, the Rationalist Society of Australia has
The Rationalist Society of Australia is urging secular-minded Victorians to join in calling on the Victorian government to deliver on its promise to remove Christian
